- Achieve Excellence through Transformative Education
- Cultivate and Strengthen Community Engagement
- Foster Innovation and Increase Research, Scholarship and Creative Activity (RSCA)
- Be a Growing, High-Performing and Healthy University
Achieve Excellence through Transformative Education
Category | Baseline (Fall 2017 or FY18) | FY19 Results | FY20 Results | FY21 Results | FY22 Results | FY23 Results | Imagine 2023 Goal (Fall 2022 or FY23) | Definition/Instructions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Student Headcount | 12,527 | 12,107 | 11,518 | 11,405 | 11,465 | 11,331 | 13,567 | |
Undergraduate Headcount | 10736 | 10,390 | 9,923 | 9,843 | 9,717 | 9,816 | 11,717 | |
Professional Headcount | 405 | 388 | 378 | 364 | 342 | 284 | 425 | 20 vet science |
Graduate Headcount | 1,386 | 1,329 | 1,217 | 1,198 | 1,406 | 1,231 | 1425 | 40 student increase |
New Freshmen Headcount | 2,273 | 2,181 | 2,123 | 2,088 | 2,021 | 2,192 | 2,600 | |
New Transfer Headcount | 612 | 501 | 476 | 446 | 476 | 462 | 750 | Fall Headcount |
Underrepresented Headcount | 3,394 | 3,235 | 3,181 | 2,913 | 2,839 | 2,643 | 4,635 | Non-White, Pell Eligible, Disability All students, UG/GR (10% increase) |
Online Programs | 33 | 46 | 46 | 58 | 59 | 86 | 46 | # of Program Offerings |
Off-Site Programs | 15 | 22 | 20 | # of In-Person Program Offerings not on Brookings Campus (University Centers, etc.) | ||||
Dual Credit Headcount | 534 | 623 | 578 | 642 | 808 | 903 | 630 | |
On-Campus Headcount | 10,545 | 9,334 | 9,111 | 8,516 | 8,573 | 8,578 | 10,507 | 8% increase |
Category | Baseline (Fall 2017 or FY18) | FY19 Results | FY20 Results | FY21 Results | FY22 Results | FY23 Results | Imagine 2023 Goal (Fall 2022 or FY23) | Definition/Instructions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First-Time, Full-Time Retention Rate | 77.20% | 75.90% | 78.30% | 81.00% | 79.90% | 78.80% | 80% | In Program/In University |
Underrepresented Retention Rate | 71.32% | 68.67% | 73.08% | 77.33% | 72.88% | 73.16% | 76% |
Category | Baseline (Fall 2017 or FY18) | FY19 Results | FY20 Results | FY21 Results | FY22 Results | FY23 Results | Imagine 2023 Goal (Fall 2022 or FY23) | Definition/Instructions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-Year Graduation Rate | 30.70% | 36.40% | 35.90% | 40.70% | 41.50% | 35% | ||
6-Year Graduation Rate | 55.40% | 56.50% | 56.40% | 58.80% | 59.20% | 57% | ||
Underrepresented. 4-Year Grad Rate | 24.43% | 27.39% | 24.36% | 30.28% | 34.87% | 27% | ||
Underrepresented 6-Year Grad Rate | 46.69% | 46.35% | 42.30% | 45.34% | 52.30% | 48% |
Category | Baseline (Fall 2017 or FY18) | FY19 Results | FY20 Results | FY21 Results | FY22 Results | FY23 Results | Imagine 2023 Goal (Fall 2022 or FY23) | Definition/Instructions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Accredited/Certified Programs | 45 | 49 | 50 | 57 | 60 | 61 |
Category | Baseline (Fall 2017 or FY18) | FY19 Results | FY20 Results | FY21 Results | FY22 Results | FY23 Results | Imagine 2023 Goal (Fall 2022 or FY23) | Definition/Instructions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Undergrad Placement Rate | Survey development | 92.6%% | 89.40% | 88.30% | 95% | First Destination Survey - Question 1. Total students employed full-time/part-time, volunteer service, military service, enrolled in graduate school/continuing education. |
Category | Baseline (Fall 2017 or FY18) | FY19 Results | FY20 Results | FY21 Results | FY22 Results | FY23 Results | Imagine 2023 Goal (Fall 2022 or FY23) | Definition/Instructions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Faculty/Staff Led Programs | 18 | 24 | 21* * All programs canceled | 0 | 8 | 24 | 28 | # of International Programs |
# Students Participating in Study Abroad | 380 | 501 | 90 (18**) ** Students abroad and then all returned home due to COVID | 5*** *** Students in International Internships Spain Online programs | 188 | Enrolling now | 500 | Unduplicated # of students participating in a study abroad experience |
Category | Baseline (Fall 2017 or FY18) | FY19 Results | FY20 Results | FY21 Results | FY22 Results | FY23 Results | Imagine 2023 Goal (Fall 2022 or FY23) | Definition/Instructions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher-Order Learning (First-year students) | 36.1 | 35.3 | 34.9 | N/A | 36.3 | N/A | Rating equal to or greater than peer institutions. | Each EI is scored on a 60-point scale. To produce an indicator score, the response set for each item is converted to a 60-point scale (e.g., Never = 0; Sometimes = 20; Often = 40; Very often = 60), and the rescaled items are averaged. Thus a score of zero means a student responded at the bottom of the scale for every item in the EI, while a score of 60 indicates responses at the top of the scale on every item. |
Higher-Order Learning (Seniors) | 38.6 | 38.1 | 38.5 | N/A | 37.3 | N/A | Rating equal to or greater than peer institutions. | Each EI is scored on a 60-point scale. To produce an indicator score, the response set for each item is converted to a 60-point scale (e.g., Never = 0; Sometimes = 20; Often = 40; Very often = 60), and the rescaled items are averaged. Thus a score of zero means a student responded at the bottom of the scale for every item in the EI, while a score of 60 indicates responses at the top of the scale on every item. |
Reflective and Integrative Learning (First-year students) | 32.5 | 31.4 | 31.3 | N/A | 33.2 | N/A | Rating equal to or greater than peer institutions. | Each EI is scored on a 60-point scale. To produce an indicator score, the response set for each item is converted to a 60-point scale (e.g., Never = 0; Sometimes = 20; Often = 40; Very often = 60), and the rescaled items are averaged. Thus a score of zero means a student responded at the bottom of the scale for every item in the EI, while a score of 60 indicates responses at the top of the scale on every item. |
Reflective and Integrative Learning (Seniors) | 36.1 | 35.9 | 35 | N/A | 35.2 | N/A | Rating equal to or greater than peer institutions. | Each EI is scored on a 60-point scale. To produce an indicator score, the response set for each item is converted to a 60-point scale (e.g., Never = 0; Sometimes = 20; Often = 40; Very often = 60), and the rescaled items are averaged. Thus a score of zero means a student responded at the bottom of the scale for every item in the EI, while a score of 60 indicates responses at the top of the scale on every item. |
Learning Strategies (First-year students) | 35.8 | 32.8 | 34.5 | N/A | 35.6 | N/A | Rating equal to or greater than peer institutions. | Each EI is scored on a 60-point scale. To produce an indicator score, the response set for each item is converted to a 60-point scale (e.g., Never = 0; Sometimes = 20; Often = 40; Very often = 60), and the rescaled items are averaged. Thus a score of zero means a student responded at the bottom of the scale for every item in the EI, while a score of 60 indicates responses at the top of the scale on every item. |
Learning Strategies (Seniors) | 36.3 | 33.5 | 34.8 | N/A | 33.5 | N/A | Rating equal to or greater than peer institutions. | Each EI is scored on a 60-point scale. To produce an indicator score, the response set for each item is converted to a 60-point scale (e.g., Never = 0; Sometimes = 20; Often = 40; Very often = 60), and the rescaled items are averaged. Thus a score of zero means a student responded at the bottom of the scale for every item in the EI, while a score of 60 indicates responses at the top of the scale on every item. |
Quantitative Reasoning (First-year students) | 27.2 | 27.1 | 27 | N/A | 29.1 | N/A | Rating equal to or greater than peer institutions. | Each EI is scored on a 60-point scale. To produce an indicator score, the response set for each item is converted to a 60-point scale (e.g., Never = 0; Sometimes = 20; Often = 40; Very often = 60), and the rescaled items are averaged. Thus a score of zero means a student responded at the bottom of the scale for every item in the EI, while a score of 60 indicates responses at the top of the scale on every item. |
Quantitative Reasoning (Seniors) | 31.1 | 30.3 | 28.9 | N/A | 29.9 | N/A | Rating equal to or greater than peer institutions. | Each EI is scored on a 60-point scale. To produce an indicator score, the response set for each item is converted to a 60-point scale (e.g., Never = 0; Sometimes = 20; Often = 40; Very often = 60), and the rescaled items are averaged. Thus a score of zero means a student responded at the bottom of the scale for every item in the EI, while a score of 60 indicates responses at the top of the scale on every item. |
Collaborative Learning (First-year students) | 35.5 | 36 | 33.9 | N/A | 32.8 | N/A | Rating equal to or greater than peer institutions. | Each EI is scored on a 60-point scale. To produce an indicator score, the response set for each item is converted to a 60-point scale (e.g., Never = 0; Sometimes = 20; Often = 40; Very often = 60), and the rescaled items are averaged. Thus a score of zero means a student responded at the bottom of the scale for every item in the EI, while a score of 60 indicates responses at the top of the scale on every item. |
Collaborative Learning (Seniors) | 34.9 | 35.8 | 35.9 | N/A | 34.8 | N/A | Rating equal to or greater than peer institutions. | Each EI is scored on a 60-point scale. To produce an indicator score, the response set for each item is converted to a 60-point scale (e.g., Never = 0; Sometimes = 20; Often = 40; Very often = 60), and the rescaled items are averaged. Thus a score of zero means a student responded at the bottom of the scale for every item in the EI, while a score of 60 indicates responses at the top of the scale on every item. |
Discussions with Diverse Others (First-year students) | 35.9 | 34.8 | 33.6 | N/A | 34.3 | N/A | Rating equal to or greater than peer institutions. | Each EI is scored on a 60-point scale. To produce an indicator score, the response set for each item is converted to a 60-point scale (e.g., Never = 0; Sometimes = 20; Often = 40; Very often = 60), and the rescaled items are averaged. Thus a score of zero means a student responded at the bottom of the scale for every item in the EI, while a score of 60 indicates responses at the top of the scale on every item. |
Discussions with Diverse Others (Seniors) | 34.3 | 34.1 | 37.9 | N/A | 34.7 | N/A | Rating equal to or greater than peer institutions. | Each EI is scored on a 60-point scale. To produce an indicator score, the response set for each item is converted to a 60-point scale (e.g., Never = 0; Sometimes = 20; Often = 40; Very often = 60), and the rescaled items are averaged. Thus a score of zero means a student responded at the bottom of the scale for every item in the EI, while a score of 60 indicates responses at the top of the scale on every item. |
Student-Faculty Interactions (First-year students) | 20.8 | 21.6 | 21.4 | N/A | 23.8 | N/A | Rating equal to or greater than peer institutions. | Each EI is scored on a 60-point scale. To produce an indicator score, the response set for each item is converted to a 60-point scale (e.g., Never = 0; Sometimes = 20; Often = 40; Very often = 60), and the rescaled items are averaged. Thus a score of zero means a student responded at the bottom of the scale for every item in the EI, while a score of 60 indicates responses at the top of the scale on every item. |
Student-Faculty Interactions (Seniors) | 24.6 | 24.4 | 25 | N/A | 25 | N/A | Rating equal to or greater than peer institutions. | Each EI is scored on a 60-point scale. To produce an indicator score, the response set for each item is converted to a 60-point scale (e.g., Never = 0; Sometimes = 20; Often = 40; Very often = 60), and the rescaled items are averaged. Thus a score of zero means a student responded at the bottom of the scale for every item in the EI, while a score of 60 indicates responses at the top of the scale on every item. |
Effective Teaching Practices (First-year students) | 36 | 34.7 | 35.3 | N/A | 35.6 | N/A | Rating equal to or greater than peer institutions. | Each EI is scored on a 60-point scale. To produce an indicator score, the response set for each item is converted to a 60-point scale (e.g., Never = 0; Sometimes = 20; Often = 40; Very often = 60), and the rescaled items are averaged. Thus a score of zero means a student responded at the bottom of the scale for every item in the EI, while a score of 60 indicates responses at the top of the scale on every item. |
Effective Teaching Practices (Seniors) | 38.2 | 38.4 | 38.1 | N/A | 37.4 | N/A | Rating equal to or greater than peer institutions. | Each EI is scored on a 60-point scale. To produce an indicator score, the response set for each item is converted to a 60-point scale (e.g., Never = 0; Sometimes = 20; Often = 40; Very often = 60), and the rescaled items are averaged. Thus a score of zero means a student responded at the bottom of the scale for every item in the EI, while a score of 60 indicates responses at the top of the scale on every item. |
Quality of Interaction (First-year students) | 42.6 | 41 | 43.5 | N/A | 41.7 | N/A | Rating equal to or greater than peer institutions. | Each EI is scored on a 60-point scale. To produce an indicator score, the response set for each item is converted to a 60-point scale (e.g., Never = 0; Sometimes = 20; Often = 40; Very often = 60), and the rescaled items are averaged. Thus a score of zero means a student responded at the bottom of the scale for every item in the EI, while a score of 60 indicates responses at the top of the scale on every item. |
Quality of Interaction (Seniors) | 41.1 | 42.3 | 43 | N/A | 42.6 | N/A | Rating equal to or greater than peer institutions. | Each EI is scored on a 60-point scale. To produce an indicator score, the response set for each item is converted to a 60-point scale (e.g., Never = 0; Sometimes = 20; Often = 40; Very often = 60), and the rescaled items are averaged. Thus a score of zero means a student responded at the bottom of the scale for every item in the EI, while a score of 60 indicates responses at the top of the scale on every item. |
Supportive Environment (First-year students) | 35.4 | 34.2 | 33.5 | N/A | 33.4 | N/A | Rating equal to or greater than peer institutions. | Each EI is scored on a 60-point scale. To produce an indicator score, the response set for each item is converted to a 60-point scale (e.g., Never = 0; Sometimes = 20; Often = 40; Very often = 60), and the rescaled items are averaged. Thus a score of zero means a student responded at the bottom of the scale for every item in the EI, while a score of 60 indicates responses at the top of the scale on every item. |
Supportive Environment (Seniors) | 32 | 32.1 | 30.5 | N/A | 30.3 | N/A | Rating equal to or greater than peer institutions. | Each EI is scored on a 60-point scale. To produce an indicator score, the response set for each item is converted to a 60-point scale (e.g., Never = 0; Sometimes = 20; Often = 40; Very often = 60), and the rescaled items are averaged. Thus a score of zero means a student responded at the bottom of the scale for every item in the EI, while a score of 60 indicates responses at the top of the scale on every item. |
Students Participating in 2 or More High Impact Practices (First-year students) | 20% | 14% | 12% | N/A | 9% | N/A | Rating equal to or greater than peer institutions. | Percentage who participated ("Done" or "In Progress") in two or more High-Impact Practice (i.e. Learning Community, Service-learning, Research with Faculty, Internship/Field Experience, Study Abroad, Culminating Senior Experience). |
Students Participating in 2 or More High Impact Practices (Seniors) | 78% | 68% | 75% | N/A | 73% | N/A | Rating equal to or greater than peer institutions. | Percentage who participated ("Done" or "In Progress") in two or more High-Impact Practice (i.e. Learning Community, Service-learning, Research with Faculty, Internship/Field Experience, Study Abroad, Culminating Senior Experience). |
Overall Experience (First-year students) | 88% | 81% | 83% | N/A | 82% | N/A | Rating equal to or greater than peer institutions. | Percentage rating their overall experience as "Excellent" or Good" |
Overall Experience (Seniors) | 88% | 88% | 86% | N/A | 84% | N/A | Rating equal to or greater than peer institutions. | Percentage rating their overall experience as "Excellent" or Good" |
Attend 成人视频 Again (First-year students) | 88% | 83% | 83% | N/A | 86% | N/A | Rating equal to or greater than peer institutions. | Percentage who would "Definitely" or "Probably" attend this institution again |
Attend 成人视频 Again (Seniors) | 85% | 87% | 87% | N/A | 83% | N/A | Rating equal to or greater than peer institutions. | Percentage who would "Definitely" or "Probably" attend this institution again |
Cultivate and Strengthen Community Engagement
Category | Baseline (Fall 2017 or FY18) | FY19 Results | FY20 Results | FY21 Results | FY22 Results | Imagine 2023 Goal (Fall 2022 or FY23) | Definition/Instructions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Patents | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 21 | New Domestic and international patents awarded |
Number of Licenses | 7 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 16 | Number of new licenses issued of patented and unpatented university assets for external use |
Number of Inventions | 20 | 25 | 18 | 9 | 25 | 55 | New Invention disclosures filed |
Number of Startups | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 11 | New enterprises initiated and "registered" that utilize university technology or expertise |
Category | Baseline (Fall 2017 or FY18) | FY19 Results | FY20 Results | FY21 Results | FY22 Results | FY23 Results | Imagine 2023 Goal (Fall 2022 or FY23) | Definition/Instructions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Underrepresented Students | 27% | 27% | 28% | 25% | 25% | 23% | 32% | Non-White, Pell Eligible, Disability All students, UG/GR |
Underrepresented Faculty | 19% | 19% | 18% | 19% | 20% | Non-white | ||
Underrepresented Staff | 10% | 10% | 11% | 11% | 11% | Non-white |
Category | Baseline (Fall 2017 or FY18) | FY19 Results | FY20 Results | FY21 Results | FY22 Results | FY23 Results | Imagine 2023 Goal (Fall 2022 or FY23) | Definition/Instructions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Campus Climate Assessment | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Assessment Benchmark: 5.5 or higher. To what extent do you agree with the following statements? (KEY: (1) Strongly disagree, (2), (3), (4) Neutral, (5), (6), (7) Strongly agree, Not applicable). |
F/S: Perceptions of Institution | 5.14 | 5.03 | 5.19 | N/A | 5.05 | N/A | 5.5 | Questions include: institution is welcoming, this institution is respectful this institution encourages free and open discussion on difficult topics, institution makes me feel included as a member of the community, institution encourages faculty and staff to openly share their ideas, institution has a strong commitment to diversity, institution adequately keeps faculty and staff informed on important matters. |
F/S: Visibility (Diversity) | 4.92 | 4.91 | 5.00 | N/A | 4.78 | N/A | 5.5 | Questions include: institution has students from diverse backgrounds, institution has faculty from diverse backgrounds, institution has staff from diverse backgrounds, institution has senior leadership from diverse backgrounds. |
F/S: Work Environment | 5.77 | 5.70 | 5.80 | N/A | 5.77 | N/A | 5.5 | Questions include: I am satisfied with my opportunity for career advancement at this institution, my job allows for an appropriate balance between my professional and personal commitments, I receive recognition or praise for doing good work, I can share appropriate opinions without fear of reprisal, different views and perspectives are encouraged in my work environment, appropriate and inclusive language is used in my work environment, I feel welcome in my work environment. |
F/S: Administrative Policies | 5.09 | 5.13 | 5.26 | N/A | 5.14 | N/A | 5.5 | Questions include: institution proactively implements policies to prevent discrimination related to abilities/disabilities, institution proactively implements policies to prevent discrimination related to age, institution proactively implements policies to prevent discrimination related to gender, institution proactively implements policies to prevent discrimination related to political ideology, institution proactively implements policies to prevent discrimination related to race, institution proactively implements policies to prevent discrimination related to religion/faith, institution proactively implements policies to prevent discrimination related to sexual orientation, institution proactively implements policies to prevent discrimination related to socioeconomic status. |
F/S: Campus Safety | 5.54 | 5.46 | 5.61 | N/A | 5.64 | N/A | 5.5 | Questions include: institution is a safe place for students, institution is a safe place for faculty and staff, institution does enough to protect the safety of faculty and staff, institution does enough to protect the safety of students, institution has adequate outdoor lighting, institution is safe to walk around at night, I am satisfied with the physical safety of my work environment. |
F/S: Overall Perceptions | 5.45 | 5.27 | 5.29 | N/A | 5.21 | N/A | 5.5 | Questions include: overall, I am satisfied with my work environment, I would recommend working at this institution to a close friend, I feel accepted by students, I feel valued by students, I feel accepted by faculty and staff, I feel valued by faculty and staff, I belong at this institution, I have considered leaving this institution because of an issue related to diversity, inclusion, or appreciation of differences. |
S: Perceptions of Institution | 5.79 | 5.85 | 5.81 | N/A | 5.72 | N/A | 5.5 | Questions include: institution is welcoming, institution is respectful, Students at this institution are treated fairly regardless of their abilities/disabilities, Students at this institution are treated fairly regardless of their age, Students at this institution are treated fairly regardless of their gender, Students at this institution are treated fairly regardless of their race, Students at this institution are treated fairly regardless of their religion/faith, Students at this institution are treated fairly regardless of their sexual orientation, Students at this institution are treated fairly regardless of their socioeconomic status. |
S: Visibility (Diversity) | 5.50 | 5.54 | 5.61 | N/A | 5.61 | N/A | 5.5 | Questions include: institution has students from diverse backgrounds, institution has faculty from diverse backgrounds, institution has staff from diverse backgrounds, institution has senior leadership from diverse backgrounds. |
S: Co-Curricular Environment | 5.52 | 5.62 | 5.64 | N/A | 5.64 | N/A | 5.5 | Questions include: student activities offered by this institution enhance my ability to interact with people who are different from myself (i.e., race, gender, beliefs, etc.), student activities offered by this institution enhance my ability to value and respect people who are different from myself (i.e.,race, gender, beliefs, etc.), student activities offered by this institution enhance my ability to work with people who are different from myself (i.e., race, gender, beliefs, etc.), student organizations at this institution are welcoming, student organizations at this institution reflect diverse groups of people. |
S: Campus Safety | 5.65 | 5.65 | 5.75 | N/A | 5.53 | N/A | 5.5 | Questions include: institution is a safe place for students, institution keeps the campus safe, institution does enough to protect the safety of students, institution has adequate outdoor lighting, institution is safe to walk around at night. |
S: Overall Satisfaction | 5.03 | 5.03 | 5.66 | N/A | 5.60 | N/A | 5.5 | Questions include: overall, I am satisfied with my experience at this institution, I belong at this institution, I would recommend this institution to a friend, I feel accepted by students at this institution, I feel valued by students at this institution. |
Category | Baseline (Fall 2017 or FY18) | FY19 Results | FY20 Results | FY21 Results | FY22 Results | FY23 Results | Imagine 2023 Goal (Fall 2022 or FY23) | Definition/Instructions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Great Colleges to Work For Assessment | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 65% or higher = Good |
Survey Average | 61% - Fair to Mediocre (2017 Survey) | N/A | 64% | 62% | N/A | Good or Higher | Institution's average percent positive for each survey dimension, that is, the percentage of your faculty and staff that responded "Strongly Agree" or "Agree" to the statements comprising each dimension. | |
Job Satisfaction | 68% - Good (2017 Survey) | N/A | 72% | 67% | N/A | Good or Higher | Institution's average percent positive for each survey dimension, that is, the percentage of your faculty and staff that responded "Strongly Agree" or "Agree" to the statements comprising each dimension. | |
Shared Governance | 57% - Fair to Mediocre (2017 Survey) | N/A | 59% | N/A | N/A | Good or Higher | Institution's average percent positive for each survey dimension, that is, the percentage of your faculty and staff that responded "Strongly Agree" or "Agree" to the statements comprising each dimension. | |
Professional Development | 67% - Good (2017 Survey) | N/A | 66% | 57% | N/A | Good or Higher | Institution's average percent positive for each survey dimension, that is, the percentage of your faculty and staff that responded "Strongly Agree" or "Agree" to the statements comprising each dimension. |
Category | Baseline (Fall 2017 or FY18) | FY19 Results | FY20 Results | FY21 Results | FY22 Results | FY23 Results | Imagine 2023 Goal (Fall 2022 or FY23) | Definition/Instructions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Business/Industry Partnerships | 671 | 939 | ||||||
Education Partnerships | Plus 54 | Number of public-private agreements in effect and number of new agreements signed | ||||||
Community Partnerships | Plus 34 | K-12, Tech, TCU, etc. |
Category | Baseline (Fall 2017 or FY18) | FY19 Results | FY20 Results | FY21 Results | FY22 Results | FY23 Results | Imagine 2023 Goal (Fall 2022 or FY23) | Definition/Instructions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rank, Promotion, Tenure Success Rate | 86.00% | 90% | 96% | 91% | 94% | 95% | 85% | |
Great Colleges Professional Development Metric | 67% - Good | N/A | 66% | 57% | N/A | Good or Higher |
Foster Innovation and Increase Research, Scholarship and Creative Activity (RSCA)
Category | Baseline (Fall 2017 or FY18) | FY19 Results | FY20 Results | FY21 Results | FY22 Results | Imagine 2023 Goal (Fall 2022 or FY23) | Definition/Instructions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 686 $173,238,092 | 697 $174,666,269 | 702 $160,933,340 | 604 $173,568,025 | 546 $247,244,016 | 925 $255,861,912 | Number of external funding proposals from across all university sectors submitted and total amount proposed |
By Funding Source | F: 324 $146,041,997 S:124 $14,463,196 FP: 87 $3,477,723 O: 151 $9,255,176 | F: 318 $146,856,641 S:135 $15,713,273 FP: 78 $3,862,437 O: 166 $8,233,918 | F: 338 $139,240,677 S: 162 $8,808,680 FP: 44 $2,693,617 O: 158 $10,190,3688 | F: 306 $135,002,475 S: 128 $27,932,587 FP: 52 $2,728,641 O: 118 $7,919,258 | F: 248 $218,981,386 S: 122 $13,047,983 FP: 23 $1,852,380 O: 153 $13,362,267 | F: 319 $196,543,963 S: 135 $25,113,263 FP: 108 $9,279,678 O: 197 $21,925,008 | Number and amount of external funding proposals submitted by funding source. F: Federal. S: State. FP: For-Profit. O: Other |
Category | Baseline (Fall 2017 or FY18) | FY19 Results | FY20 Results | FY21 Results | FY22 Results | Imagine 2023 Goal (Fall 2022 or FY23) | Definition/Instructions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 471 $45,771,735 | 464 $45,417,039 | 406 $38,283,876 | 412 $48,757,685 | 402 $50,665,023 | 619 $60,365,139 | Number of external funding proposals from across all university sectors submitted and total amount proposed |
By Funding Source | F: 215 $33,197,503 S:44 $4,771,571 FP: 55 $2,185,890 O: 157 $5,616,771 | F: 235 $33,576,347 S:43 $4,634,454 FP: 56 $2,475,561 O: 130 $4,730,678 | F: 206 $27,035,043 S:43 $3,378,935 FP: 45 $2,441,291 O: 112 $5,428,607 | F:251 $39,843,709 S:37 $3,796,881 FP:32 $1,466,367 O: 92 $3,650,728 | F: 244 $41,733,012 S: 44 $3,620,469 FP: 21 $1,016,424 O: 93 $4,295,117 | F: 276 $42,577,970 S:69 $6,748,594 FP: 70 $3,124,224 O: 199 $7,914,351 | Number and amount of external funding proposals submitted by funding source. F: Federal. S: State. FP: For-Profit. O: Other |
Category | Baseline (Fall 2017 or FY18) | FY19 Results | FY20 Results | FY21 Results | FY22 Results | Imagine 2023 Goal (Fall 2022 or FY23) | Definition/Instructions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | $63,465,669 | $67,590,710 | $60,938,954 | $51,539,655 | $59,589,547 | $86,753,249 | Total research program expenditures, including both external grants and contracts and internal funds |
By Funding Source | F: $27,657,015 S:$16,607,998 FP: $1,902,290 O: $17,249,430 U: $48,936 | F: $30,479,110 S:$15,663,144 FP: $1,954,867 O: $19,385,855 U: $107,734 | F: $22,530,959 S; $16,476,211 FP: $1,879,321 O: $19,930,907 U: $121,556 | F: $18,605,745 S: 15,712,747 FP: $1,303,507 O: $15,865,125 U: 52,531 | F: $22,990,680 S:$16,266,711 FP: $1,278,316 O: $18,971,014 U: $82,826 | F: $37,374,531 S:$23,159,843 FP: $2,979,439 O: $23,181,084 U: $58,352 | Number and amount of external funding proposals submitted by funding source. F: Federal. S: State. FP: For-Profit. O: Other U: University |
Category | Baseline (Fall 2017 or FY18) | FY19 Results | FY20 Results | FY21 Results | FY22 Results | Imagine 2023 Goal (Fall 2022 or FY23) | Definition/Instructions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peer-Reviewed Publications | 431 | 783 | 718 | 672 | 337 | 800 | 成人视频 faculty, staff or student authorship of work that is reviewed by peers and published |
Creative Works | 1,273 | 664 | 726 | 550 | 456 | 1,650 | Creative products other than peer reviewed literature of research, scholarship, creativity and performances by 成人视频 faculty, staff and students |
Open PRAIRIE Downloads | 198,901 | 267,564 | 556,906 | 576,078 | 569,010 | 1,000,000 | Total downloads between FY18 and FY23 |
Be a Growing, High-Performing and Healthy University
Category | Baseline (Fall 2017 or FY18) | FY19 Results | FY20 Results | FY21 Results | FY22 Results | FY23 Results | Imagine 2023 Goal (Fall 2022 or FY23) | Definition/Instructions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
% Faculty Voluntary Turnover | 5.37% | 5.89% | 3.90% | 4.69% | 6.00% | 5-10% | ||
% NFE Voluntary Turnover | 6.31%% | 10.22% | 6.77% | 6.48% | 14.00% | 5-10% | ||
% CSA Voluntary Turnover | 11.46% | 10.72% | 8.09% | 11.30% | 12.80% | 5-10% |
Category | Baseline (Fall 2017 or FY18) | FY19 Results | FY20 Results | FY21 Results | FY22 Results | FY23 Results | Imagine 2023 Goal (Fall 2022 or FY23) | Definition/Instructions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Headcount | 12,527 | 12,107 | 11,518 | 11,405 | 11,465 | 11,331 | 13,567 | |
Credit Hour Production (SCH) | 150,170 | 145,626 | 139,816 | 137,520 | 134,324 | 134,786 | 162,183 | |
Philanthropic Gifts in Total Dollars | $58.9M | $56.9M | $62.8M | $73.3M | $121.6M | $425 million | Comprehensive Campaign goal | |
Number of 成人视频 Bold Initiatives | Wokini Initiative | Sioux Falls Academy | 12.00 | Total number of 成人视频 Bold initiatives that meet the criteria outlined below from your area. 成人视频 Bold Initiatives should: (1) Align with Imagine 2023, (2) Transform the University and state, (3) Increase National/International acclaim, (4) Make the University unique in marketplace, (5) Cultivate and strengthen community engagement and collaboration. |